Selected
Works, Artist Statement, Education,
Selected Exhibitions, Research
& Workshops,
Professional Organizations, Awards, Recently
Published, Currently Showing, Collected
by.
![]() |
![]() |
| Vase 9 1/4" Tall |
Teapot 3 3/4" Tall |
![]() |
|
| Dinner
Set of Three Plate 10 1/2" Diameter |
Wine
Cups 4" Tall 2 1/2" Diameter |
![]() |
![]() |
| Covered
Jars 5" Tall 5" Diameter |
Large
Spiral Bowl 7 1/2" Tall 13" Diameter |
![]() |
![]() |
| Dinner
Set of Three Plate 10 1/4" Diameter |
Teapot
and Tea Cups Teapot 6" Tall 8" Diameter Tea Cups 2 1/2" Tall 3 1/2" Diameter |
![]() |
![]() |
| Teapot
and Mugs Teapot 6" Tall 6" Diameter| Mugs 3 3/4" Tall 3 3/4" Diameter |
Large
Bowl 6" Tall 13 1/2" Diameter |
![]() |
![]() |
| Covered
Jar 9 1/2" Tall 8 1/2" Diameter |
Red
Stoneware and Porcelain Vases Red Stoneware Vase 5 1/2" Tall 5 1/2" Diameter Porcelain Vase 9" Tall 3 3/4" Diameter |
![]() |
![]() |
| Covered Box 3 1/2" Tall 7" Diameter |
Place Setting |
I am continually drawn to the many layers of meaning that pottery carries. Historically, cultures have formed strong and lasting identities around their ceramics – China with porcelain, Japan with teawares, Italy with majolica and terracotta, etc. Ceramic materials themselves carry a matrix of assumptions. For example, porcelain symbolizes purity, preciousness, translucency and high technology. Pottery as a vessel for cuisine identifies us with our cultures as strongly as our food and eating habits do. Pottery is part of the furniture of our daily lives and is an indicator of our personas – elegant or casual, literal or metaphorical, traditional or modern. Edmund de Waal comments, “Pots ask us key questions. Not just if we like the look of something, not if it brings us pleasure, though both these things are under rated, but what our relationship with things is actually about.
By making and selling in an urban environment, the pots I make are a reflection of this environment. Historically, pots made for use were made in quantity and were made with production in mind, as opposed to creating a precious few rarified objects. The work I make follows this historical approach and is made to be compatible and companionable with each other. I make tableware – mostly cups, bowls, plates and teapots. These are the pots that we become most acquainted with through daily use. The pieces I make are intended to be interacted with – they are made to be put out on the table and used. A statement by British potter Walter Keeler captures the intent of making functional work: “The goal in this complex process is the finished pot performing its function; a surprising object doing a commonplace job.”
I am currently working with porcelain and red stoneware with a clear glaze and black glaze finish. This allows me to focus on form, using the glaze to finish the piece rather than to decorate it. I feel this helps unify the clay and the glaze rather than creating a separation between the two.
I enjoy the fluidity of working with clay and exploit the process of potting for my decoration – making use of finger grooves, trimming lines, glaze pools and marks from handling and firing. I am continually interested in how these elements give a pot “life.” The depth of surface created by the translucent properties of porcelain and the way clay and glaze interact with light creates an interesting tension between “inside” and “outside.”
M.F.A. Ceramics 1996 - 1998 Kent State University, Kent, Ohio. At Kent Dan studied Wheel-thrown Pottery, Ceramic Sculpture, Woodfired Ceramics, Contemporary Issues in Pottery and Ceramic Sculpture.
B.A. Fine Arts 1992 - 1996 University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, Washington 1995 Ceramics Research in Mashiko, Kyoto, and Tokyo, Japan.
| 2005 |
|
| 2004 |
|
| 2003 |
|
| 2002 |
|
| 2001 |
|
| 2000 |
|
| 1999 |
|
| 1998 |
|
| 1998 |
|
| 1997 |
|
| 1996 |
|
| 1995 |
|
| 1994 |
|
| 1993 |
|
| 1997 |
|
| 1996 |
|
| 1995 |
|
Copyright Restrictions : All images are provided for reference only and may not be reproduced without permission.